All submissions will be subjected to an anonymous double blind peer review process to evaluate the suitability of the contribution for publication. In the event of conflicting recommendations, a further reviewer or reviewers may be consulted. Peer reviewers will be requested to report in writing, with clear recommendations for acceptance of the paper in question with or without revision or rejection. Reviewer reports will be assessed by the Managing Editor to decide whether, individually and collectively, they support the publication of the contribution; whether improvements must be effected and/or further work is done and reported on in accordance with the reviewer reports and comments, or whether the contribution should be rejected. The Editorial Board will refer contributions back to authors should the referees make recommendations and comments requiring correction of errors, revision, etc.